Peer Review reports
From: Caipirini: using gene sets to rank literature
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 13 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Graham Poulter |
| 29 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jason Moore |
| 28 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sean O'Donoghue |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 28 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 28 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Graham Poulter |
| 3 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jason Moore |
| 14 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sean O'Donoghue |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 14 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
| Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
| 31 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sean O'Donoghue |
| Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
| 31 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
| Publishing | ||
| 1 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
| 1 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1756-0381-5-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.