Peer Review reports
From: Caipirini: using gene sets to rank literature
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
12 Oct 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
13 Mar 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Graham Poulter |
29 Jun 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jason Moore |
28 Nov 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Sean O'Donoghue |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
28 Nov 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
28 Nov 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Graham Poulter |
3 Dec 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Jason Moore |
14 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sean O'Donoghue |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
14 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 6 | |
31 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Sean O'Donoghue |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
31 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
1 Feb 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
1 Feb 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1756-0381-5-1 |
You can find further information about peer review here.