Skip to main content

Table 2 Classification performance of deep learning algorithms on LGG and GBM subtypes for validation set

From: DeepAutoGlioma: a deep learning autoencoder-based multi-omics data integration and classification tools for glioma subtyping

 

Methods

Performance measures (Average of 10 fold cross-validation on test datset)

Accuracy [95% CI]

Precision [95% CI]

Recall [95% CI]

F1-score [95% CI]

FPR [95% CI]

Gmean [95% CI]

MCC [95% CI]

LGG

ANN

90.18%

82.40%

84.23%

82.42%

0.07

90.06%

0.8

[98.16–98.20]

[82.35–82.45]

[84.19–84.27]

[82.37–82.47]

[0.05–0.09]

[90.04–90.08]

[0.75–0.85]

CNN

95.23%

92.08%

92.63%

91.84%

0.03

95.30%

0.9

[95.22–95.24]

[92.05–92.11]

[92.60- 92.66]

[91.83–91.87]

[0.02–0.04]

[95.29–95.31]

[0.86–0.94]

GBM

ANN

93.85%

93.85%

93.85%

93.85%

0

1

1

[93.79–93.91]

[93.79–93.91]

[93.79–93.91]

[93.79–93.91]

[0–0]

[1–1]

[1–1]

CNN

90.26%

85.38%

87.69%

86.15%

0.02

95.26%

0.92

[90.20–90.32]

[85.29–85.47]

[87.62–87.76]

[86.06–86.24]

[0–0.04]

[95.21–95.31]

[0.84–1]