Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison with state of the art methods

From: 6mA-StackingCV: an improved stacking ensemble model for predicting DNA N6-methyladenine site

Species

Methods

ACC

MCC

SN

SP

Rosaceae

Meta-i6mA*

0.953

0.905

0.954

0.951

i6mA-Fuse_FV*

0.943

0.887

0.924

0.962

i6mA-Fuse_RC*

0.893

0.786

0.890

0.895

i6mA-stack_FV*

0.928

0.856

0.928

0.927

i6mA-stack_RC*

0.899

0.798

0.920

0.877

i6mA-Pred*

0.840

0.684

0.897

0.782

iDNA6mA-Rice*

0.878

0.764

0.951

0.805

MM-6mAPred*

0.873

0.758

0.961

0.785

6mA-Finder*

0.846

0.701

0.928

0.764

i6mA-vote*

0.955

0.909

0.955

0.954

6mA-StackingCV

0.960

0.920

0.959

0.961

Rice

Meta-i6mA*

0.880

0.768

0.957

0.802

i6mA-Fuse_FV*

0.890

0.781

0.921

0.859

i6mA-Fuse_RC*

0.775

0.571

0.907

0.644

i6mA-stack_FV*

0.876

0.756

0.938

0.815

i6mA-stack_RC*

0.813

0.640

0.915

0.712

i6mA-Pred*

0.791

0.592

0.878

0.705

iDNA6mA-Rice*

0.755

0.561

0.960

0.547

MM-6mAPred*

0.834

0.689

0.958

0.710

6mA-Finder*

0.809

0.636

0.928

0.690

i6mA-vote*

0.882

0.774

0.961

0.803

6mA-StackingCV

0.845

0.710

0.963

0.726

Arabidopsis

Meta-i6mA*

0.787

0.600

0.636

0.936

i6mA-Fuse_FV*

0.749

0.542

0.545

0.949

i6mA-Fuse_RC*

0.757

0.534

0.615

0.897

i6mA-stack_FV*

0.770

0.570

0.604

0.933

i6mA-stack_RC*

0.751

0.514

0.634

0.865

i6mA-Pred*

0.730

0.462

0.679

0.780

iDNA6mA-Rice*

0.734

0.473

0.655

0.812

MM-6mAPred*

0.765

0.531

0.784

0.747

6mA-Finder*

0.724

0.448

0.741

0.706

i6mA-vote*

0.798

0.617

0.666

0.929

6mA-StackingCV

0.782

0.576

0.677

0.886

  1. The asterisk (*) indicated that the results were from the literature [45]