Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparison of the number of samples constituting the clusters obtained by considering the complete set of variables (rows) and the subset of variables in the case studies A and C (columns)

From: Disclosing transcriptomics network-based signatures of glioma heterogeneity using sparse methods

  

Case A

Case C (K = 2)

  

C1

C2

C1

C2

Complete dataset

C1

390

38

387

41

C2

53

141

59

135

  1. These outcomes refer to the best clustering performances, obtained for K = 2 and L1 = 2