Skip to main content

Table 21 The proposed methods compared with the hybrid of MIFS and RFE

From: Effective hybrid feature selection using different bootstrap enhances cancers classification performance

Datasets

Train

Data %

Test

Data %

Over-fitting

Diff. %

Pre

Rec

F1-score

NO.F

F-Time

(sec)

C-Time

(sec)

AUC

Var.

ACC

%

RF classifier

 RNA gene

100.000

99.501

0.499

0.794

0.715

0.723

5000

10,227.579

1.199

1.000

0.000041

99.501

 DNA CNV

92.908

85.034

7.874

0.770

0.716

0.717

4500

88,434.627

3.411

0.946

0.000698

85.034

 Parkinson’s

disease

100.000

83.861

16.139

0.809

0.737

0.759

150

74.445

0.411

0.876

0.002867

83.861

 Dermatology

diseases

99.727

94.819

4.908

0.941

0.930

0.930

12

1.113

0.079

0.996

0.001528

94.819

 BreastEW

100.000

95.965

4.035

0.961

0.953

0.956

10

1.592

0.133

0.988

0.000756

95.965