Skip to main content

Table 15 The proposed methods compared with the ConsistencySubsetEval method

From: Effective hybrid feature selection using different bootstrap enhances cancers classification performance

Datasets

Train

Data %

Test

Data %

Over-fitting

Diff. %

Pre

Rec

F1-score

NO.F

F-Time

(sec)

C-Time

(sec)

AUC

Var.

ACC

%

J48 classifier

 RNA gene

93.106

91.136

1.97

0.880

0.869

0.869

3

1.850

0.001

0.963

0.000641

91.136

 DNA CNV

64.842

63.921

0.921

0.550

0.549

0.543

42

1.600

0.012

0.816

0.001172

63.921

 Parkinson’s

disease

86.346

80.279

6.067

0.765

0.688

0.707

11

1.100

0.003

0.738

0.002407

80.279

 Dermatology

diseases

87.918

87.740

0.178

0.751

0.755

0.742

12

0.102

0.0006

0.946

0.002407

87.740

 BreastEW

96.993

94.380

2.613

0.950

0.933

0.939

8

0.090

0.0008

0.971

0.000873

94.380

Naïve base classifier

 RNA gene

97.545

97.380

0.165

0.972

0.970

0.970

3

1.850

0.001

0.994

0.000188

97.380

 DNA CNV

73.015

71.606

1.409

0.682

0.698

0.680

42

1.600

0.006

0.923

0.001276

71.606

 Parkinson’s

disease

76.940

75.516

1.424

0.666

0.599

0.605

11

1.100

0.0005

0.729

0.003051

75.516

 Dermatology

diseases

90.265

89.839

0.426

0.878

0.901

0.867

12

0.102

0.0007

0.995

0.002740

89.839

 BreastEW

94.630

94.201

0.429

0.943

0.934

0.937

8

0.090

0.002

0.988

0.000686

94.201

K-nearest neighbors(KNN) classifier

 RNA gene

97.517

97.131

0.386

0.963

0.964

0.962

3

1.850

0.001

0.993

0.000311

97.131

 DNA CNV

82.735

77.059

5.676

0.750

0.680

0.685

42

1.600

0.0001

0.888

0.000465

77.059

 Parkinson’s

disease

79.100

69.698

9.402

0.557

0.524

0.517

11

1.100

0.002

0.583

0.002962

69.698

 Dermatology

diseases

97.632

95.916

1.716

0.962

0.943

0.947

12

0.102

0.0008

0.994

0.001339

95.916

 BreastEW

95.704

93.496

2.208

0.937

0.925

0.929

8

0.090

0.0009

0.965

0.000621

93.496