Open Peer Review Reports for: Use case driven evaluation of open databases for pediatric cancer research
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 21 Aug 2018 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 31 Aug 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Romano |
| 6 Sep 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Krzysztof Cios |
| 7 Sep 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pablo Cámara |
| 8 Oct 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Fleur Jeanquartier |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 8 Oct 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 9 Oct 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Krzysztof Cios |
| 16 Oct 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Romano |
| 19 Oct 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pablo Cámara |
| 16 Nov 2018 | Author responded | Author comments - Fleur Jeanquartier |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 16 Nov 2018 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 3 Dec 2018 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Joseph Romano |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 4 | |
| Publishing | ||
| 5 Dec 2018 | Editorially accepted | |
| 15 Jan 2019 | Article published | 10.1186/s13040-018-0190-8 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
