Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Methods for enhancing the reproducibility of biomedical research findings using electronic health records

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Apr 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Bietenbeck
30 Jun 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Lesske
7 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Spiros Denaxas
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
20 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Bietenbeck
22 Jul 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Frank Lesske
31 Jul 2017 Author responded Author comments - Spiros Denaxas
Resubmission - Version 3
31 Jul 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Bietenbeck
18 Aug 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jessica Tenenbaum
22 Aug 2017 Author responded Author comments - Spiros Denaxas
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Aug 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
28 Aug 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Sep 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13040-017-0151-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement