Table 2 The average detection power and the average running time with their respective standard deviations of compared methods on 100-SNP data sets
From: epiACO - a method for identifying epistasis based on ant Colony optimization algorithm
Evaluation measures | Models | epiMODE | TEAM | BOOST | SNPRuler | AntEpiSeeker | AntMiner | MACOED | IACO | epiACO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Detection power (%) | ME Models | Model 1 | 45.42 ± 3.58 | 89.75 ± 1.22 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 81.95 ± 2.57 | 89.51 ± 1.67 | 76.45 ± 5.10 | 100.00 ± 0.0 | 100.00 ± 0.0 |
Model 2 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 14.03 ± 0.15 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 33.57 ± 7.28 | 86.75 ± 4.36 | 84.52 ± 4.90 | 94.37 ± 1.84 | 97.85 ± 1.34 | ||
NME Modes | Model 3 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 100.00 ± 0.0 | 100.00 ± 0 | 100.00 ± 0.0 | 26.83 ± 6.25 | 85.47 ± 5.00 | 74.67 ± 4.90 | 26.83 ± 6.08 | 75.25 ± 5.83 | |
Model 4 | 0.00 ± .000 | 79.77 ± 1.76 | 100.00 ± 0 | 100.00 ± 0.0 | 42.33 ± 7.87 | 100.00 ± 0.0 | 82.13 ± 3.74 | 30.14 ± 7.21 | 81.87 ± 6.33 | ||
Model 5 | 0.00 ± .000 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 100.00 ± 0 | 98.52 ± 1.48 | 76.45 ± 4.12 | 100.00 ± 0.0 | 76.33 ± 3.46 | 44.67 ± 11.4 | 75.62 ± 7.75 | ||
Running time (second) | ME Models | Model 1 | 98.22 ± 0.81 | 35.13 ± 0.26 | 0.33 ± 0.06 | 0.93 ± 0.02 | 28.73 ± 0.50 | 1100.50 ± 26.08 | 52.56 ± 0.57 | 25.03 ± 0.45 | 23.48 ± 0.44 |
Model 2 | 95.70 ± 0.75 | 34.78 ± 0.26 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.96 ± 0.03 | 29.08 ± 0.54 | 1101.60 ± 65.09 | 53.64 ± 0.77 | 28.22 ± 0.56 | 25.07 ± 0.49 | ||
NME Models | Model 3 | 97.36 ± 0.64 | 35.02 ± 0.27 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 28.74 ± 0.35 | 1002.90 ± 52.95 | 59.92 ± 0.57 | 26.78 ± 0.77 | 25.77 ± 0.37 | |
Model 4 | 99.21 ± 0.83 | 34.90 ± 0.26 | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 0.98 ± 0.02 | 28.14 ± 0.40 | 1017.00 ± 36.01 | 59.68 ± 0.70 | 26.21 ± 0.44 | 18.29 ± 0.37 | ||
Model 5 | 95.89 ± 0.70 | 35.22 ± 0.26 | 0.28 ± 0.04 | 0.97 ± 0.02 | 28.77 ± 0.53 | 1102.30 ± 27.59 | 52.76 ± 0.66 | 26.14 ± 0.37 | 25.19 ± 0.47 | ||