Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Semantics-based plausible reasoning to extend the knowledge coverage of medical knowledge bases for improved clinical decision support

BioData Mining201710:7

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-017-0123-y

Received: 1 March 2016

Accepted: 10 January 2017

Published: 10 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Mar 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Stoeckert
10 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Jack
1 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Hossein Mohammadhassanzadeh
Resubmission - Version 2
1 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Jack
1 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christian Stoeckert
9 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hossein Mohammadhassanzadeh
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
10 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
10 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s13040-017-0123-y

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
NICHE Research Group, Faculty of Computer Science, Dalhousie University
(2)
Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University

Advertisement