Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

A biologically informed method for detecting rare variant associations

  • Carrie Colleen Buchanan Moore1,
  • Anna Okula Basile2,
  • John Robert Wallace3,
  • Alex Thomas Frase3 and
  • Marylyn DeRiggi Ritchie2, 3Email author
Contributed equally
BioData Mining20169:27

Received: 4 January 2016

Accepted: 18 June 2016

Published: 30 August 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
4 Jan 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Scott Auerbach
20 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mahdi Belcaid
6 May 2016 Author responded Author comments - Anna Basile
Resubmission - Version 2
6 May 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Jun 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mahdi Belcaid
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Jun 2016 Editorially accepted
30 Aug 2016 Article published 10.1186/s13040-016-0107-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Duke University Medical Center, Duke General Surgery, Durham, USA
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Center for Systems Genomics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, USA
Biomedical and Translational Informatics, Geisinger Health System, Danville, USA