Skip to content

Advertisement

  • SHORT REPORT
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Iteratively refining breast cancer intrinsic subtypes in the METABRIC dataset

  • Heloisa H. Milioli1, 2,
  • Renato Vimieiro3,
  • Inna Tishchenko1, 4,
  • Carlos Riveros1, 4,
  • Regina Berretta1, 4 and
  • Pablo Moscato1, 4Email author
BioData Mining20169:2

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13040-015-0078-9

Received: 16 July 2015

Accepted: 25 December 2015

Published: 13 January 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
16 Jul 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dominik Heider
24 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Heloisa Milioli
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dominik Heider
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
25 Dec 2015 Editorially accepted
13 Jan 2016 Article published 10.1186/s13040-015-0078-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Priority Research Centre for Bioinformatics, Biomarker Discovery and Information-Based Medicine, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, Australia
(2)
School of Environmental and Life Science, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
(3)
Centro de Informática, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil
(4)
School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia

Advertisement