This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A classification and characterization of two-locus, pure, strict, epistatic models for simulation and detection
© Urbanowicz et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 5 November 2013
Accepted: 23 May 2014
Published: 9 June 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Nov 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Ryan Urbanowicz|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|22 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Timothy Hohman|
|19 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingileif Hallgrimsdottir|
|24 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Ryan Urbanowicz|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|24 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Timothy Hohman|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 May 2014||Editorially accepted|
|9 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/1756-0381-7-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.