Diverse convergent evidence in the genetic analysis of complex disease: coordinating omic, informatic, and experimental evidence to better identify and validate risk factors
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Sep 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Daumer|
|16 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rita Cantor|
|13 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Reif|
|5 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Timothy Ciesielski|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rita Cantor|
|22 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Reif|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jun 2014||Editorially accepted|
|30 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/1756-0381-7-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.