This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Diverse convergent evidence in the genetic analysis of complex disease: coordinating omic, informatic, and experimental evidence to better identify and validate risk factors
- Timothy H Ciesielski1, 2Email author,
- Sarah A Pendergrass†3, 4,
- Marquitta J White†1, 2, 5,
- Nuri Kodaman†1, 2, 5,
- Rafal S Sobota1, 2, 5,
- Minjun Huang1,
- Jacquelaine Bartlett2,
- Jing Li1,
- Qinxin Pan1,
- Jiang Gui2, 6,
- Scott B Selleck4,
- Christopher I Amos2, 6,
- Marylyn D Ritchie3, 4,
- Jason H Moore1, 2, 6 and
- Scott M Williams1, 2Email author
© Ciesielski et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 18 September 2013
Accepted: 8 June 2014
Published: 30 June 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Sep 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martin Daumer|
|16 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rita Cantor|
|13 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Reif|
|5 Mar 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Timothy Ciesielski|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Mar 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rita Cantor|
|22 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - David Reif|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|8 Jun 2014||Editorially accepted|
|30 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/1756-0381-7-10|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.