Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Using random walks to identify cancer-associated modules in expression data

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Dec 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Clarence Zhang
16 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jason Moore
20 Mar 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Georgios Pavlopoulos
20 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Deanna Petrochilos
Resubmission - Version 2
20 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Jul 2013 Author responded Author comments - Deanna Petrochilos
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jul 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
9 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Georgios Pavlopoulos
10 Sep 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jason Moore
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
24 Sep 2013 Editorially accepted
15 Oct 2013 Article published 10.1186/1756-0381-6-17

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement