This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Using random walks to identify cancer-associated modules in expression data
© Petrochilos et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 17 December 2012
Accepted: 24 September 2013
Published: 15 October 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|17 Dec 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Clarence Zhang|
|16 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jason Moore|
|20 Mar 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Georgios Pavlopoulos|
|20 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Deanna Petrochilos|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|20 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Jul 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Deanna Petrochilos|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Jul 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Georgios Pavlopoulos|
|10 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jason Moore|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|24 Sep 2013||Editorially accepted|
|15 Oct 2013||Article published||10.1186/1756-0381-6-17|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.