Skip to main content

Table 8 Agreement among aligners in S2 trimmed data

From: How do alignment programs perform on sequencing data with varying qualities and from repetitive regions?

 

Comparison pair

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

Class 4

Randomly report one alignment per read

SOAP2 vs. Bowtie1 (3,890,070)2

94.94%

4.84%

0.20%

0.02%

SOAP2 vs.BWA (3,900,529)

94.69%

4.82%

0.20%

0.29%

Bowtie vs. BWA (3,892,602)

94.77%

4.96%

0.0002%

0.27%

SOAP2 vs. Novoalign (3,909,055)

93.84%

5.32%

0.34%

0.50%

Bowtie vs. Novoalign (3,901,709)

94.50%

5.30%

0.15%

0.50%

BWA vs. Novoalign (3,908,656)

93.96%

5.30%

0.33%

0.41%

Suppress reads with multiple alignments

SOAP2 vs. Bowtie (3,611,489)

96.20%

0.0002%

3.79%

0.02%

 

SOAP2 vs.BWA (3,636,423)

96.42%

0.0007%

2.87%

0.70%

 

Bowtie vs. BWA (3,531,986)

98.38%

0.00%

0.0007%

1.62%

 

SOAP2 vs. Novoalign (3,638,616)

98.07%

0.54%

0.32%

0.76%

 

Bowtie vs. Novoalign(3,631,179)

95.06%

0.52%

0.11%

4.31%

 

BWA vs. Novoalign (3,652,782)

97.99%

0.54%

0.70%

3.31%

  1. 1. Comparison pair in the format of aligner 1 vs. aligner 2.
  2. 2. Total number of reads aligned by either of these two aligners in a comparison pair.