Skip to main content

Table 7 Agreement among aligners in S1 trimmed data

From: How do alignment programs perform on sequencing data with varying qualities and from repetitive regions?

 

Comparison pair

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

Class 4

Randomly report one alignment per read

SOAP2 vs. Bowtie1 (6,409,534)2

95.89%

3.95%

0.13%

0.03%

SOAP2 vs.BWA (6,440,873)

95.42%

3.92%

0.13%

0.52%

Bowtie vs. BWA (6,432,433)

95.30%

4.21%

0.00002%

0.49%

SOAP2 vs. Novoalign (6,430,033)

94.62%

4.84%

0.13%

0.35%

Bowtie vs. Novoalign (6,422,084)

94.77%

4.84%

0.07%

0.33%

BWA vs. Novoalign (6,435,917)

94.83%

4.84%

0.30%

0.05%

Suppress reads with multiple alignments

SOAP2 vs. Bowtie (6,020,802)

95.29%

0.0002%

4.68%

0.003%

 

SOAP2 vs.BWA (6,068,512)

96.26%

0.0005%

2.93%

0.81%

 

Bowtie vs. BWA (5,890,868)

97.42%

0.00%

0.0004%

2.58%

 

SOAP2 vs. Novoalign (6,043,150)

98.47%

0.95%

0.18%

0.40%

 

Bowtie vs. Novoalign (6,035,510)

94.11%

0.92%

0.06%

4.92%

 

BWA vs. Novoalign (6,066,586)

95.62%

0.92%

0.57%

2.90%

  1. 1. Comparison pair in the format of aligner 1 vs. aligner 2.
  2. 2. Total number of reads aligned by either of these two aligners in a comparison pair.