Skip to main content

Table 5 Agreement among aligners in S1 non-trimmed data

From: How do alignment programs perform on sequencing data with varying qualities and from repetitive regions?

 

Comparison pair

Class 1

Class 2

Class 3

Class 4

Randomly report one alignment per read

SOAP2 vs. Bowtie1 (5,626,038)2

96.25%

3.41%

0.34%

0.002%

SOAP2 vs.BWA (5,656,559)

95.72%

3.40%

0.34%

0.54%

Bowtie vs. BWA (5,637,504)

95.80%

3.66%

0.00002%

0.54%

SOAP2 vs. Novoalign (5,757,260)

85.13%

7.32%

5.27%

2.28%

Bowtie vs. Novoalign (5,748,724)

85.18%

7.26%

5.13%

2.47%

BWA vs. Novoalign (5,835,451)

85.20%

7.24%

5.37%

2.19%

Suppress reads with multiple alignments

SOAP2 vs. Bowtie (5,321,512)

95.78%

0.00002%

4.22%

0.003%

 

SOAP2 vs.BWA (5,361,466)

96.50%

0.0005%

2.75%

0.75%

 

Bowtie vs. BWA (5,213,871)

97.76%

0.00%

0.0004%

2.24%

 

SOAP2 vs. Novoalign (5,447,206)

88.14%

4.27%

5.28%

2.31%

 

Bowtie vs. Novoalign (5,432,410)

84.72%

4.08%

5.02%

6.18%

 

BWA vs. Novoalign (5,458,788)

85.92%

4.11%

5.48%

4.49%

  1. 1. Comparison pair in the format of aligner 1 vs. aligner 2.
  2. 2. Total number of reads aligned by either of these two aligners in a comparison pair.