Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Predicting the difficulty of pure, strict, epistatic models: metrics for simulated model selection

  • Ryan J Urbanowicz1,
  • Jeff Kiralis1,
  • Jonathan M Fisher1 and
  • Jason H Moore1Email author
BioData Mining20125:15

https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-5-15

Received: 24 April 2012

Accepted: 14 September 2012

Published: 26 September 2012

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Apr 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - William Bush
23 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison Motsinger-Reif
27 Jul 2012 Author responded Author comments - Ryan Urbanowicz
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Jul 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
14 Sep 2012 Editorially accepted
26 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1756-0381-5-15

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Genetics, Institute for Quantitative Biomedical Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, USA

Advertisement