This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Peer2ref: a peer-reviewer finding web tool that uses author disambiguation
© Andrade-Navarro et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 5 July 2011
Accepted: 15 August 2012
Published: 7 September 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Jul 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ju Han Kim|
|22 Sep 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sean O'Donoghue|
|6 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Carolina Perez-Iratxeta|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|6 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ju Han Kim|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 Aug 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sean O'Donoghue|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|15 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|7 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1756-0381-5-14|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.