Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Caipirini: using gene sets to rank literature

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Graham Poulter
29 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jason Moore
28 Nov 2011 Author responded Author comments - Sean O'Donoghue
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Nov 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Graham Poulter
3 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jason Moore
14 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sean O'Donoghue
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
31 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Sean O'Donoghue
Resubmission - Version 7
31 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
1 Feb 2012 Editorially accepted
1 Feb 2012 Article published 10.1186/1756-0381-5-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement