This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A comparison of genomic copy number calls by Partek Genomics Suite, Genotyping Console and Birdsuite algorithms to quantitative PCR
© Grayson and Aune; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 11 October 2010
Accepted: 13 April 2011
Published: 13 April 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Oct 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jason Moore|
|12 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Steven McCarroll|
|16 Feb 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Aune|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Feb 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Apr 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Thomas Aune|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 Apr 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Apr 2011||Editorially accepted|
|13 Apr 2011||Article published||10.1186/1756-0381-4-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.