Skip to main content

Table 6 False negative prediction: statistical significance of the difference in performance between the methods.

From: A comparison of machine learning techniques for survival prediction in breast cancer

ANOVA

P= 2.75 × 10-9

GP vs. SVM-K1

GP vs. SVM-K2

GP vs. SVM-K3

GP vs. MP

GP vs. RF

P = 2.74 × 10-6

P = 3.32 × 10-6

P = 1.27 × 10-10

P = 8.53 × 10-6

P = 4.65 × 10-7

  1. First line shows ANOVA test on the 6 samples of solutions found by each method, while second line depicts pairwise 2-tailed Student t-tests comparing GP with each other method.
Back to article page

BioData Mining

ISSN: 1756-0381