Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A comparison of machine learning techniques for survival prediction in breast cancer

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
29 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margaret Eppstein
19 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sung Bum Cho
15 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mario Giacobini
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margaret Eppstein
2 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sung Bum Cho
22 Feb 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mario Giacobini
Resubmission - Version 3
22 Feb 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Margaret Eppstein
31 Mar 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sung Bum Cho
22 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mario Giacobini
Resubmission - Version 4
22 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
5 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Mario Giacobini
Resubmission - Version 5
5 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
11 May 2011 Editorially accepted
11 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1756-0381-4-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement