This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
SICTIN: Rapid footprinting of massively parallel sequencing data
© Enroth et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 23 February 2010
Accepted: 13 August 2010
Published: 13 August 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|23 Feb 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Green|
|29 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rita Casadio|
|12 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yang Chen|
|14 Jun 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Stefan Enroth|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Jun 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|14 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Richard Green|
|15 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rita Casadio|
|18 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yang Chen|
|12 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Stefan Enroth|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Aug 2010||Editorially accepted|
|13 Aug 2010||Article published||10.1186/1756-0381-3-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.