Arete – candidate gene prioritization using biological network topology with additional evidence types
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 24 August 2016
Accepted: 12 June 2017
Published: 6 July 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|24 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|19 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Younghee Lee|
|8 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arjun Krishnan|
|8 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Artem Lysenko|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|31 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Younghee Lee|
|19 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arjun Krishnan|
|20 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Artem Lysenko|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Jun 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arjun Krishnan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Jun 2017||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jul 2017||Article published||10.1186/s13040-017-0141-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.