Table 2 Performance of all combinations of uniform prioritization methods.
From: DA DA: Degree-Aware Algorithms for Network-Based Disease Gene Prioritization
Candidate deg. | Seed deg. | Centrality | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Avg. Rank | 20.89 | 20.82 | 20.56 | 21.07 | 21.10 | 21.38 | 21.14 | 20.95 | 21.52 |
AUROC | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.80 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.79 |
Perc. ranked in top 1% | 28.18 | 26.70 | 28.01 | 24.63 | 24.07 | 26.18 | 27.85 | 27.93 | 29.41 |
Perc. ranked in top 5% | 52.67 | 52.67 | 52.01 | 51.77 | 51.93 | 50.92 | 53.16 | 52.91 | 53.57 |
